Skip to main content

Ars Arcana Blog: Forking Paths in RPGs

Forking Paths in RPGs
Ars Arcana 2.3
Travis Joseph Rodgers

Roleplaying Games offer the possibility of solitude and solidarity. This might sound paradoxical. On one hand, however, RPGs afford something sometimes pejoratively called escapism. In an RPG, the players get away from things, or at least screen off things for a time being. The etymology of solitude is instructive: in its most extreme form, an RPG offers an escape for one. At the same time, RPGs offer solidarity: a shared, kindred experience. One of the ways this was accomplished in the past was by a sort of transgressive move: the adventure books and games in which individuals separately explored a foreign world then traded the books and experienced the world the other individual had experienced, though with some individual differences. I’ll call these Forking Paths, for the Borges story (strong recommend), and I’ll explain what they are and what value they still possess.

Forking Paths
In Jorge Luis Borges’s “The Garden of Forking Paths,” the structure of the multiverse is explored. The idea lent its name to a philosophy blog focusing on the discussion of human free will. The general idea is that our choices affect the world around us, opening some doors and closing others. Outside Borges (and perhaps including Borges), the most common example was the Choose Your Own Adventure books that my classmates and I adored back in the 80s. There were others, however, that took a step beyond merely allowing one to take an isolated adventure.
There was the Lone Wolf series of books, that allowed characters to continue on, saving up equipment as they progressed through the books. There was A Spy in Isengard that allowed characters to explore Tolkien’s Middle Earth, using a simple resolution mechanic. There were probably more in this vein, but I had moved on to college and grad school and, well, other things.

On the Merits of Forking Paths
Dungeon Chatter is going to be using a kind of Forking Paths for character creation. Traveller RPG has done this, and probably other systems have as well. So, it’s not unique; it’s just good practice. On one hand, if character creation is something that can be done solo, then a Forking Paths approach is good fun. It captures the nostalgia for a lot of us, and it transforms a process of reading and digesting rules into an interactive storytelling. On the other hand, Forking Paths can be a soft introduction to gaming and game mechanics for people who haven’t engaged in RPGs previously.
Judicious use of Forking Paths can essentially lead all players separately through a session zero. They could emerge with a character, fully created, a bit of background on their character, and a sense of where their characters are headed. They could experiment with different character concepts, backgrounds, builds, and the like, without having the pressure of time and eyes on them. The fact that these things are done separately was never a problem in the past for those of us who played them, and the coming together to discuss afterwards was always a joy.


Popular posts from this blog

Ars Arcana Blog: Why No One Understands Alignment

Why No One Understands Alignment
Travis J. Rodgers
Alignment was introduced to Dungeons and Dragons as a character (NPC or PC) attribute. It wasn’t rolled for; it was typically selected, but sometimes a particular alignment was necessitated by the character’s race or class. But what is ostensibly a kind of “outlook” piece, cross-indexing a regard for law and chaos on one axis and good and evil on the other is at best a concept evolving across game versions. This fact would explain why long-time gamers, or at least gamers who have played multiple iterations of D&D, might view alignment differently from others. At worst, however, it’s essentially meaningless. There’s a middle path, which may be its original intent, one according to which alignment is both meaningful and quite objective – but then it’s extremely contentious. My considered view is that alignment is either meaningless or objective in a way that many players do not like (which is accurate is undertermined – the descript…

Ars Arcana Blog 2.7: Creating a Character SPARK

Ars Arcana Blog: Bringing Your Character to Life with SPARK
Travis J. Rodgers

The Challenge(s) For the grizzled vet of RPGs, creating a character is often a struggle of too many options rather than not knowing where to start. The character concept comes easily to mind, either because there is a character the vet has been wanting to play or because vets often have served as GM as well as player for so long, character concepts seem to spring from an endless font. The challenge becomes determining which of the system options is the best way to make use of your character concept. Let’s call this the “How? Question” of character design. On the other hand, for the relative novice to Roleplaying, the challenge is two-fold. In addition, to the struggles of navigating a system’s options, the novice may not have, and may struggle to create, the character concept. Let’s call this new question the “What? Question” of character design.
The SPARK In an episode of the Dungeon Chatter Podcast called “O…

Ars Arcana Blog: 2.8 - In Search of a Railroad

In Search of a Railroad (1 of 2 on Railroading) Travis Joseph Rodgers
Evidently, one of the worst things that can happen in an RPG is railroading. It sounds terrible, at least, to hear from many who discuss the topic on Twitter’s #rpg or #ttrpg tags. So, consider this brief essay an exercise in conceptual analysis. I’m simply attempting to understand what railroading is, such that it is objectionable.
The RPG Theory Review blog has the following to say: Railroading only takes place when player actions are prevented from having any effect on the flow of events.
Stack Exchange diagnoses the central wrong of Railroading: It's generally frowned upon, because it disrupts the free-will oriented nature of roleplaying.
The Angry GM agrees: Railroading used to refer to the GM forcing the players on a predetermined path through a story.
Even TV Tropes.Org chimes in: In short, the GM takes any measure necessary to ensure there is only one direction the campaign may proceed — his planned dire…